10.28.2010

Rods (and low light) set circadian rhythm, too

I always get a little groggy when flying cross-country. My circadian clock gets knocked off it's firm pedestal and starts jumping rope inside my head and doing handsprings through my body. To begin with, light set this clock. And I smash it by leaving California at 10AM and chasing the darkness until I arrive on the east coast 4 hours later at night.

Ugh. My rods and cones hurt.

Until recently, the color-seeing, bright-light-active cone structure in the eye was the main gateway for programming (and throwing off) the circadian rhythms that settle our body into a pattern of sleep/wake and hormone and hunger ups and downs. But, Johns Hopkins biologist Samer Hattar says--we can't count out our black-and-white-seeing rods. No one is sure exactly how circadian clocks establish the rhythm of your body's function. But, we can at least do experiments that eliminate rod or cone function in our eyes and see if it affects our (or in this case, a mouse's) circadian clock as effectively as a transatlantic flight.

Scientists genetically modified one group of mice to have only cone function (color vision, bright light), and another group of mice to have only rod function (b & w vision, low light). The first group loved Wizard of Oz. The second group never left Kansas. Both groups were exposed to varying degrees of light at varying times of day, and then ushered onto a hamster wheel to measure the amount of energy they had at morning, noon, and night compared to normal. It turns out, cone-free mice were exhausted by exposure to both dim and bright light at the wrong time, proving rods are involved in setting circadian rhythms in both dim light and in bright light.

The two main conclusions from the study:
"One is that it had previously been thought that circadian rhythms could only be set at relatively bright light intensities, and that didn't turn out to be the case," he explained. "And two, we knew going in that rods 'bleach,' or become ineffective, when exposed to very bright light, so it was thought that rods couldn't be involved in setting our clocks at all in intense light. But they are."

 So circadian rhythms can be set in low light. With rods. But, they're also set in bright light, too.

The authors suggest--it's all about getting the most contrast you can get from day to night. Lots of bright light during the day. Minimal low light at night. So, the low light from a nightlight could disrupt your circadian rhythms (if you don't get much bright light during the day either), and flying east could also have a disruptive effect, limiting your bright daylight exposure by literally shortening your day. Soaking up low light all day in an office building and all night at home can creating the same raucous of symptoms like headache and fatigue.

Finally. Someone proved why it's bad to stuff yourself in a cubicle your whole life....or bad to stuff mice in a cubicle their whole lives. Testing humans would be the next step. Then, if the same results result, the government could institute things like: daily walks outside their nursing home for the elderly, mandatory 10 minutes out front of the law firm at lunch, and pitch darkness on the red-eye flight. Stuff that we kind-of already know works anyway.


ResearchBlogging.orgAltimus CM, Güler AD, Alam NM, Arman AC, Prusky GT, Sampath AP, & Hattar S (2010). Rod photoreceptors drive circadian photoentrainment across a wide range of light intensities. Nature neuroscience, 13 (9), 1107-12 PMID: 20711184

10.19.2010

Tuesday ROUNDUP

All about journalism. Check it out:

10.14.2010

1971 protein sythesis video...with interpretive dancers?

A kitschy gem circa 1971. Directed by Robert Alan Weiss for the Department of Chemistry of Stanford University. Narrated by Paul Berg, 1980 Nobel prize for Chemistry.


10.12.2010

The deaf have super vision, and other tales of neural plasticity


Ever been asked--if you had to choose, would you rather be deaf or blind? Its a futile hypothetical dilemma (as if the choice is ever available to anyone to make) that was probably first posed by some perpetually dramatic and irrevocably bored teenager OR--could it be--by a neuroscientist!

Perhaps we cherry pick vision and hearing for our speculative crises because they are particularly important to us and essential to achieve something our species is known for: high level mobility and navigation. To be in the position to choose one to lose would be particularly painful. The good news is--a recent study of cats shows that one might be able to compensate for the other in its absence. Evidently, when the auditory system of the cat's brain isn't working (deafness), it can be hijacked by the vision system, to enhance sight. Hello--supervision.

Scientists herded cats to figure this one out. Literally. First, they observed deaf-born cat behavior and noticed significantly better peripheral vision and fine movement detection compared with hearing cats. That means, they can spot a mouse breaking into a sprint more than 90 degrees west of their water bowl whereas hearing cats would rely more on the click click of the mouse feet to notice it at such an oblong angle or great distance.

Fig. 1 Hearing cats suck.
Second, they peered into the auditory cortex (the center of hearing) of the deaf-born cats and found that, if they deactivated one spot, cats lost their super-cat distance-sight and if they deactivated another spot, cats lost their super-cat peripheral vision. The visual cortex clearly commandeers parts of the auditory cortex for its own use. 

Fig 2. Probing the auditory cortex
So, you might be wondering--do deaf humans see their world in extra high res because they can't hear? Maybe. We'll wait til that study comes out. But, it's not unheard of for the human brain to default to another area than it would normally use to do something it needed to do.

A recent UCLA study described one area of the brain that compensates for another in fear-based memory. Damage to what's called the basolateral amygdala, thought to be the only locale for fear-learning, causes another other patch of the brain to take over. So, if you had a car accident and you damaged the basolateral amygdala, after any subsequent car accident, the second area would help you learn to slow down BEFORE a red light when its raining. Hello.

Both the cat's and the memory study research what's generally called neuroplasticity of the brain. The adult brain is not this solid, unchanging wad of putty, you see. It's moving and reorganizing. In phantom limb syndrome, patients who have lost a limb experience a whole battery of changes before they learn to undo the process of feeling it in their brains. Until then, they still feel that their limb is actually there.

It's easy to see why evolution has left us with mold-able brains--it helps us keep in tune with our environment. Otherwise, we'd be in denial all the time and not able to compensate for our losses (and gains.) And with that sentiment I'll quote Dr. Leon Megginson. "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change." So there.




ResearchBlogging.orgLomber SG, Meredith MA, & Kral A (2010). Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf. Nature neuroscience PMID: 20935644


Poulos AM, Ponnusamy R, Dong HW, & Fanselow MS (2010). Compensation in the neural circuitry of fear conditioning awakens learning circuits in the bed nuclei of the stria terminalis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107 (33), 14881-6 PMID: 20679237

10.07.2010

PIC: QUARK--NO, IT'S NOT STRING CHEESE

Found: on the Vienna grocery store shelf by physicist Clifford Johnson at Asymptotia. It's a German yogurt-ey cottage cheese thing. Cheese without rennet enzymes, officially. And, no, it's not made of strings.

10.05.2010

Tuesday ROUNDUP

Check it out:

10.04.2010

Choosing mates: do we REALLY want what we say we want?


This 
post was chosen as an Editor's Selection for ResearchBlogging.org
Go check out my guest post at the Lay Scientist today. It talks about dating--do we really want a George Clooney/Heidi Klum, or is that just something we say. How do our real mates size up to our ideal mates? Also included....monkey porn. Don't ask. Just read.

10.01.2010

SCI CAL, LOS ANGELES (October)

OCTOBER
1ST    Griffith Park Obs: All Space Considered, lecture (7:30PM) Free.
2ND    NHM: San Andreas Fault excursion fieldtrip (9-5PM) $60.
4TH    Caltech: Many suns, Many worlds lecture (8PM) Free
7TH    Griffith Park Obs: By the Light of the Watery Moon, public lecture (7:30--9)
9TH    Machine Project: DIY digital synthesis workshop (12-5) $105
13TH    Caltech: The Science of Iron Man lecture (8PM) Free
14TH     JPL: Near earth asteriods to most distant galaxies lecture (7PM) Free.
15TH     Pasadena City College: Near earth asteriods to most distant galaxies lecture (7PM) Free.
16TH    Griffith Park Obs: Public Star Party,  (6-10PM) Free.
16TH    Griffith Park Obs: Day trip to Palomar Observatory  Res Req. 
23TH    Caltech: Life:Primates lecture (2PM) Free 
25TH    Griffith Park Obs: Binocular night, Cosmic Musings lecture (7:30PM) Res Req.
26TH    Huntington Library: Plant collecting in China lecture (7:30PM) $75.
27TH    Caltech: Earthquakes that shape the earth lecture (8PM) Free
29TH    Caltech: Weird Connections nanotech lecture (10AM) Free

Keep up with fun science events in one of three ways:
1. RSS: subscribe to my blog and every month, like clockwork, I will publish a list of the months events in the feed. 
To subscribe, click the orange icon on the right.
2. Add events to your own Google calendar by visiting the calendar's page and clicking the date.
2. Bookmark the calendar page and revisit!